目前的新SAT考试部分虽然新SAT写作部分已经是选考的题目，但是我们仍然不能忽视和松懈，因为很多美国的名校还是需要新SAT写作成绩的。下面是小编为大家整理收集的关于新SAT作文总分算分规则的相关介绍，希望对大家有所帮助。
1、新SAT作文怎么考?
作文部分有50分钟时间完成，是对议论文的分析性写作。考生先阅读一篇650-750单词的文章，然后分析文章当中用了哪些依据，如何运用这些依据去证明作者的观点。作文从阅读、分析和写作三个方面来打分，每个部分满分4分，分别考察考生对于文章的理解，对于文中相关内容的分析，以及写作的结构和语言能力。那么我们在SAT考试培训教学和学习中也应该从这三个方面去准备。上海美盟SAT培训中心以分析新SAT官方指南的中的一道作文题以及一篇满分范文进行解析，看看作文部分到底应该如何备考。
2、新SAT作文算分规则
算分规则
改革后的SAT作文依然会由两位阅卷人评判。每位阅卷人将以1-4分来分别评阅考生作文中的阅读、分析和写作三个维度。每个维度的得分分别相加后都会在2-8分区间内。例如，经两位阅卷人评阅后，一位考生的阅读、分析和写作三个方面的得分分别为3-2-3和3-2-3，最终将三个维度内分数分别相加后，考生的作文得分为6-4-6，即阅读维度得分6分，分析维度得分4分，写作维度得分6分。
选取官方提供的学生作文样本供大家参考。下面的作文在一位阅卷老师审阅后，得分为3/2/3，即阅读3分，分析2分，写作3分。
Sample Student Essay: 3/2/3
In the article “Why literature matters” (2005) Dana Gioia expresses that American arts have changed and that many people are beginning to no longer read. He argues that intellectual abilities are decreacing. Gioia expresses reasoning, includes evidence, and establishes word choice. His purpose is to encourage more people to begin reading again in order to improve their intellectual level. He targets everyone essentially as his audience.
Gioia expresses reasoning in paragraph five when he states that the decline in reading will lead to consequences and people will have a lower set of mental skills. He specifically states “the ability to create artistic and emotional craft a satisfying narrative,” will disappear if people no longer read. This causes the audience to reflect on his point and want to be able to expand their talents.
Gioia also includes fACTs and statistics in paragraph six in order to capture the audience’s attention so they realize that the intellectual state of peoples minds is ACTually dropping. He states, “poor reading skills ranked second, 38 percent of employers complained that local schools inadequately taught reading comprehension.” Gioia inserts this statistic to grab people’s attention, such as people who teach in schools so that we are sure that children have good reading comprehension at an early age.
Finally Gioia displays proper word choice throughout the text to express the fACT that having good reading comprehension will broaden your vocabulary. He uses the word intellectual multiple times for effect. Gioia expects that people will understand that they do need to read up on past events as well as other topics to be able to relate to society.
Gioia’s goal is to reach out to his audience and to encourage them to read, and apply their intellectual abilities to their everyday life. He has a sense of hope that people will express their abilities to grow and be fruitful with their social encounters.
This paper scored a 3/2/3.
Reading—3: This response demonstrates effective comprehension of Gioia’s text. The writer provides appropriate textual evidence (paraphrases and quotations) to capture both the main ideas of the passage (American arts have changed and that many people are beginning to no longer read and intellectual abilities are decreacing) and important details (He specifically states “the ability to create artistic and emotional craft a satisfying narrative,” will disappear if people no longer read). There are no substantive errors of fACT or interpretation in this essay. On the whole, the writer demonstrates a complete understanding of Gioia’s argument, especially the relationship between declining literary reading and social awareness (or social encounters). Overall, this response demonstrates proficient reading comprehension.
Analysis—2: The writer demonstrates a limited understanding of the analytical task and offers only a partial analysis of how Gioia builds his argument. The writer identifies some analytical elements of Gioia’s text (such as reasoning, fACTs, and word choice) and attempts to describe how these elements function in the passage. However, throughout the response, the writer provides only single assertions about elements of argumentation in Gioia’s text (This causes the audience to reflect on his point and want to be able to expand their talents). Instances of analysis, most commonly found at the end of paragraphs, illustrate some understanding on the writer’s part of how Gioia builds his argument; however, the writer does not move beyond providing assertions into effective discussion or evaluation of how evidence, reasoning, or stylistic and persuasive elements are used to build the argument. Overall, this response demonstrates only partially successful analysis.
Writing—3: This response is mostly cohesive and demonstrates broadly effective use and control of language. Starting with an effective introductory paragraph that includes a clear central claim (Gioia expresses reasoning, includes evidence, and establishes word choice. His purpose is to encourage more people to begin reading again in order to improve their intellectual level), the writer structures his essay clearly, if formulaically, around the three points of reasoning, evidence, and word choice. Each paragraph remains on-topic, and there is a clear progression of ideas within paragraphs and across the essay as a whole. The response maintains a formal style and objective tone while demonstrating a variety of sentence structures. Although sentence structures are occasionally awkward (Gioia expects that people will understand that they do need to read up on past events as well as other topics to be able to relate to society), language errors do not detrACT significantly from the quality of writing. Overall, this response demonstrates proficient writing.